YIQUAN.wiki Glossary A–Z All term pages
Bodywork · Comparison

Feldenkrais Method

Somatic learning work that came out of martial art — Feldenkrais was a judoka. Of the three foils, the one that comes closest to Yiquan.

Somatic learning

The Feldenkrais method aims neither to change tissue nor to build strength, but to improve the learning of movement itself — through small, slow movements, often performed lying down, with alert attention. Two branches: Awareness Through Movement (in groups, guided purely by speech) and Functional Integration (individual work through touch).

⚠️ A foil, not doctrine — as with Rolfing and the Alexander Technique.

The contrast falls differently here than with the other two: Rolfing works on connective tissue, Feldenkrais on the nervous system — and Feldenkrais came out of martial arts.

A physicist with a black belt

Moshé Feldenkrais (1904 Slavuta – 1984 Tel Aviv) was an engineer and physicist: Doctor of Science at the University of Paris, research assistant to the Nobel laureate Frédéric Joliot-Curie.

The most interesting strand of the biography for this wiki is judo: in September 1933 he met Jigorō Kanō in Paris and, on his recommendation, trained with Mikinosuke Kawaishi; black belt in 1936, second dan in 1938, co-founder of the Ju-Jitsu Club de France. His book Higher Judo: Groundwork argues judo explicitly as an educational practice.

The occasion for the method was a knee injury. The operation on offer had a prognosis of about fifty percent — Feldenkrais declined and reconstructed his walking through self-observation.

An observation, not a connection

Kenichi Sawai, founder of Taikiken, held a fifth dan in judo before his encounter with Yiquan. Both men thus come out of Kanō's judo and ask the same question — what actually organises movement in a person. From there they go in opposite directions: Sawai to Wang Xiangzhai, Feldenkrais into the psychology of learning.

No contact between them is documented. The parallel is an observation, not a connection — and interesting precisely for that: the same starting question, from the same origin, leads to two entirely different answers.