Alexander Technique
The oldest of the three — and the root of the others
The Alexander Technique is the oldest of the three methods set beside Yiquan, and the root of the other two: both Ida Rolf (Rolfing) and Moshé Feldenkrais (Feldenkrais) had studied Alexander's work before developing their own.
It is teaching, not treatment. With light touch and language a teacher accompanies the simplest everyday movements — sitting, standing up, walking — so that the pupil notices the habit with which they perform them, and learns to leave it off.
⚠️ A foil, not doctrine. No primary Yiquan text mentions the method; no contact is documented.
An actor with mirrors
Frederick Matthias Alexander (1869 Tasmania – 1955 London) was a reciter who regularly lost his voice on stage. Doctors found nothing; resting the voice helped only until the next performance. He concluded that he was doing something himself that ruined the voice, and watched himself speak in mirrors. The finding: he habitually pulled his head back and down, shortened the neck, breathed through the mouth. It took years before he could leave the habit off.
The ethologist Nikolaas Tinbergen devoted a substantial part of his 1973 Nobel lecture to the method and called Alexander's procedure “one of the true epic stories of medical research and practice” — praised as an achievement of observation by a man without medical training.
The same method — patient self-observation without apparatus — carries what Wang Xiangzhai calls 拳学是科学 (Entmystifizierung).
Two terms with a neighbourhood in Yiquan
Primary control: head, neck and back govern the organisation of the whole body — “let the neck be free, to let the head go forward and up, to let the back lengthen and widen.” The neighbouring image in Yiquan is the silk thread at the crown, crown upward and coccyx downward (Zhan Zhuang).
Inhibition: stopping the habitual response before acting. Explicitly not muscular relaxation but leaving-off. The neighbour here is Wu Wei (无为) — and song as a subtraction, not an addition.
This second correspondence is the more instructive. Both traditions arrive independently at the conclusion that the first step is not to do something right but to leave something habitual undone.